News | Are Mothers of Twins More Fertile? New Study Challenges Conventional Wisdom!
Past studies often suggested that women who have twins are more fertile than other women, even calling them "Supermothers." However, a new international study has overturned this long-held view.
The study found that mothers of twins are not more likely to become pregnant. Instead, having more pregnancies gives them more chances to have twins. In other words, they are not "super-fertile"; they simply have more chances to "win."
Research Data: 100,000 Historical Birth Records Examined
The research team analyzed 100,000 historical European birth records from parish archives in Norway, Sweden, Finland, Germany, and Switzerland, covering pre-industrial societies.
At that time, people could not control reproduction through contraception or assisted reproductive technology, so the data more accurately reflect women's natural fertility.
The central finding was that women with more births were more likely to have twins, not because they were naturally more fertile, but because they had more opportunities. It is like buying lottery tickets: the more often you buy, the greater your chance of winning.
The Evolutionary Paradox of Twins: Why Has Natural Selection Not Eliminated Twinning?
From an evolutionary perspective, twin births carry greater health risks and impose a physiological burden on both mother and infants. The researchers therefore asked: if twins increase reproductive risks, why has natural selection not eliminated twinning?
They offered two explanations:
Twinning may be an evolutionary "compensatory mechanism." As women age, miscarriage risk increases, and releasing two eggs at once may improve the chance of a successful pregnancy, offsetting reproductive opportunities lost to miscarriage.
Although women who have twins may have fewer pregnancies overall, they may have more children. A twin birth adds an extra child, so if infant survival is high, this reproductive pattern may still support family continuity.
A Data Pitfall: Long-Standing Statistical Errors
Why did earlier studies conclude that women who have twins become pregnant more easily? The new study says previous statistical methods confused cause and effect.
Dr. Alexandre Courtiol, principal investigator at the Leibniz Institute for Zoo and Wildlife Research, explained:
"The problem with earlier studies was that they could not distinguish whether mothers of twins were more fertile or whether having more births simply gave them more opportunities to have twins."
The new study used more advanced statistical methods to avoid the long-recognized "Simpson's Paradox": incorrectly attributing a statistical association while overlooking the true causal relationship.
Ultimately, the study found that after accounting for the number of births, mothers of twins were actually less fertile than other women, not more.
Medical Significance: Rethinking the Relationship Between Fertility and Twins
This finding has implications beyond academia. Medical research has long compared women who have twins with other women to study differences in fertility.
But Dr. Erik Postma of the University of Exeter noted:
"This research approach has serious problems because it cannot accurately distinguish which factors truly affect female fertility."
This means earlier medical research on female fertility based on data from mothers of twins may have reached incorrect conclusions. Future studies must account more precisely for the natural probability of twinning rather than treating it simply as a marker of fertility.
Many Questions Remain
Although this study challenges many traditional assumptions, scientists believe the mysteries of twinning are far from fully understood.
Study co-author Professor Virpi Lummaa of the University of Turku said:
"We still do not understand every factor that affects twin birth rates, but this study suggests that twins are not an evolutionary mistake and may instead represent a reproductive strategy."
Dr. Gine Roll Skjærvø, senior biology researcher at the Norwegian University of Science and Technology, added:
"Twin births are not simply a question of fertility, but a more complex biological phenomenon involving physiological, evolutionary, and statistical factors."
Conclusion: Dispelling the "Supermother" Myth and Rethinking the Science of Twins
Mothers of twins are not more fertile. Rather, having more births gives them more opportunities to have twins. This overturns previous assumptions and reminds us to interpret medical and evolutionary data carefully to avoid mistaking correlation for causation.
Further research is needed to reveal the full biology of twin births.
News | Are Mothers of Twins More Fertile? New Study Challenges Conventional Thinking
News | Are Mothers of Twins More Fertile? New Study Challenges Conventional Wisdom!
Past studies often suggested that women who have twins are more fertile than other women, even calling them "Supermothers." However, a new international study has overturned this long-held view.
The study found that mothers of twins are not more likely to become pregnant. Instead, having more pregnancies gives them more chances to have twins. In other words, they are not "super-fertile"; they simply have more chances to "win."
Research Data: 100,000 Historical Birth Records Examined
The research team analyzed 100,000 historical European birth records from parish archives in Norway, Sweden, Finland, Germany, and Switzerland, covering pre-industrial societies.
At that time, people could not control reproduction through contraception or assisted reproductive technology, so the data more accurately reflect women's natural fertility.
The central finding was that women with more births were more likely to have twins, not because they were naturally more fertile, but because they had more opportunities. It is like buying lottery tickets: the more often you buy, the greater your chance of winning.
The Evolutionary Paradox of Twins: Why Has Natural Selection Not Eliminated Twinning?
From an evolutionary perspective, twin births carry greater health risks and impose a physiological burden on both mother and infants. The researchers therefore asked: if twins increase reproductive risks, why has natural selection not eliminated twinning?
They offered two explanations:
Twinning may be an evolutionary "compensatory mechanism." As women age, miscarriage risk increases, and releasing two eggs at once may improve the chance of a successful pregnancy, offsetting reproductive opportunities lost to miscarriage.
Although women who have twins may have fewer pregnancies overall, they may have more children. A twin birth adds an extra child, so if infant survival is high, this reproductive pattern may still support family continuity.
A Data Pitfall: Long-Standing Statistical Errors
Why did earlier studies conclude that women who have twins become pregnant more easily? The new study says previous statistical methods confused cause and effect.
Dr. Alexandre Courtiol, principal investigator at the Leibniz Institute for Zoo and Wildlife Research, explained:
"The problem with earlier studies was that they could not distinguish whether mothers of twins were more fertile or whether having more births simply gave them more opportunities to have twins."
The new study used more advanced statistical methods to avoid the long-recognized "Simpson's Paradox": incorrectly attributing a statistical association while overlooking the true causal relationship.
Ultimately, the study found that after accounting for the number of births, mothers of twins were actually less fertile than other women, not more.
Medical Significance: Rethinking the Relationship Between Fertility and Twins
This finding has implications beyond academia. Medical research has long compared women who have twins with other women to study differences in fertility.
But Dr. Erik Postma of the University of Exeter noted:
"This research approach has serious problems because it cannot accurately distinguish which factors truly affect female fertility."
This means earlier medical research on female fertility based on data from mothers of twins may have reached incorrect conclusions. Future studies must account more precisely for the natural probability of twinning rather than treating it simply as a marker of fertility.
Many Questions Remain
Although this study challenges many traditional assumptions, scientists believe the mysteries of twinning are far from fully understood.
Study co-author Professor Virpi Lummaa of the University of Turku said:
"We still do not understand every factor that affects twin birth rates, but this study suggests that twins are not an evolutionary mistake and may instead represent a reproductive strategy."
Dr. Gine Roll Skjærvø, senior biology researcher at the Norwegian University of Science and Technology, added:
"Twin births are not simply a question of fertility, but a more complex biological phenomenon involving physiological, evolutionary, and statistical factors."
Conclusion: Dispelling the "Supermother" Myth and Rethinking the Science of Twins
Mothers of twins are not more fertile. Rather, having more births gives them more opportunities to have twins. This overturns previous assumptions and reminds us to interpret medical and evolutionary data carefully to avoid mistaking correlation for causation.
Further research is needed to reveal the full biology of twin births.
Story source:
Collected online